![]() The torpedo defense system also comes in for some design criticism: Prince of Wales and her sisters were too small to tolerate extensive longitudinal bulkheads. Navy would accept longitudinal bulkheads in their machinery spaces. It was not until the design of the battleships of the proposed Montana Class (BB67-71) with beams of 122 feet (37.2 meters) that the U.S. American and French designers avoided centerline bulkheads like the plague in their contemporary battleship designs, opting for large machinery spaces that would flood without creating damaging lists. ![]() The decision to use centerline bulkheads in the King George V Class was a serious design flaw. Only one ship managed to limp back for repairs, while sixteen others capsized and sank. A survey of damage to World War II Japanese cruisers, which had centerline bulkheads in their machinery spaces, noted they behaved very poorly when they sustained damage on one side. Although smaller machinery spaces can limit the amount of flooding, this advantage is more than offset by the effects of off center flooding, leading to devastating lists. Specifically, the centerline machinery space bulkheads may have been a factor:Ĭenterline machinery space bulkheads were incorporated to enhance survivability, but such subdivision actually decreases it. In "DEATH OF A BATTLESHIP, THE LOSS OF HMS PRINCE OF WALES" Marine Forensics Analysis of the Sinking Garzke, Dulin and Denlay put together the latest information on dives to the Prince of Wales (2012) and claim that serous design flaws in the King George V class Battleships may have led to her demise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |